Debated in Parliament on 12 Jan 2022.
The following statement was made during Question Time at the Sitting of 12 January 2022:
In my earlier reply, I have also said that IMDA had in the last five years deemed six other publications to be objectionable, for denigrating various religious communities. None of them were about politics either. They either contained offensive and prejudicial comments about other religions or espoused polemical religious teachings which were likely to cause ill will and hatred amongst the different religious groups in Singapore. "Red Lines" is objectionable for similar reasons. [Please refer to “Considerations for Classifying 'Red Lines: Political Cartoons and the Struggle Against Censorship' as Objectionable under Undesirable Publications Act”, Official Report, 12 January 2022, Vol 95, Issue No 46, Oral Answers to Questions section.]
Written statement by Mrs Josephine Teo circulated with leave of the Speaker in accordance with Standing Order No 29(5):
I wish to make the following factual clarification to the reply given during Question Time at the Sitting on 12 January 2022. My reply should read as follows:
In my earlier reply, I have also said that IMDA had in the last five years deemed six other publications to be objectionable, for denigrating various religious communities. None of them were about politics either. They either contained offensive and prejudicial content about other religions or espoused polemical religious teachings which were likely to cause ill will and hatred amongst the different religious groups in Singapore. "Red Lines" is objectionable for similar reasons.
PAPERCUTS