Debated in Parliament on 5 Oct 2021.
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong asked the Minister for Transport (a) what are the lessons learned from the abrupt exit of oBike from Singapore; and (b) what are the protective measures which LTA may now require of all operators of similar public-subscribed transport schemes in the interest of (i) consumers for loss of deposit payments (ii) local service providers for unpaid services rendered and (iii) public authorities for arranging disposal of abandoned equipment.
When dockless bicycle sharing services first entered Singapore, they offered Singaporeans another convenient travel option. At that time, LTA deliberately adopted a light touch regulatory approach towards this new innovative business model. Many users have used the services for their commuting needs. However, the proliferation of the services also led to indiscriminate parking and many stranded bicycles. To address these disamenities, we started licensing bicycle-sharing operators in 2018 under the Parking Places Act. That was when oBike made the commercial decision to close its operations.
Whilst all current licensees do not require deposits from consumers, the enhanced regulations also allow LTA to prohibit bicycle-sharing licensees from doing so should the need arise. This strengthened regulatory framework provides a foundation for sustainable and responsible device-sharing operations in Singapore.
In addition, companies and consumers with claims against any operator can seek redress through the civil courts. Consumers may also seek assistance from the Consumer Association of Singapore (CASE).