Debated in Parliament on 7 Apr 2020.
Debate resumed.
Deputy Prime Minister.
Mr Speaker, Sir, I thank Members of this House for your strong encouragement and helpful suggestions at this Debate on our Solidarity Budget. Beyond this House, I thank fellow Singaporeans for supporting our frontline workers and the many thoughtful perspectives shared with me and my team.
The battle against COVID-19 is entering a critical phase. Today, we begin a period of tough pre-emptive restrictions to break the transmission chain and to head off the possibility of the outbreak escalating. Our livelihoods and our economy will be disrupted for a while, but we have to do this for our health, and the well-being of our people.
Many Members have told me how the last two months have felt like a year. So much has been happening so fast. The latest circuit breaker measures have dominated our discussions so much. It is useful for us to reinforce the importance of adhering strictly to the circuit breaker measures, but this Budget debate was originally scheduled to debate the Resilience Budget, as some Members reminded us.
So, let us remind everyone that we should look at all three Budgets – Unity, Resilience and Solidarity, and the total allocation of $160 billion. With that as a backdrop, I will round up the debate by sharing my thoughts on this crisis.
First, the nature of this crisis, and how it differs from past crises faced by Singapore and the world.
Second, what we must do now, even as we speak, to stay united and stay resilient.
Third, how our people and our nation, can emerge stronger when the storm passes.
Lastly, I will conclude with some reflections on the critical importance of good governance.
First, the nature of this crisis. Mr Liang Eng Hwa and Mr Saktiandi Supaat asked what is the nature of this current crisis that we are facing now and how different it is from the past crises which Singapore has faced. These are very important questions. Almost everyone in this House described the current crisis as “unprecedented”.
Indeed, COVID-19 has been unparalleled in its spread and impact on the medical, economic, financial and other fronts. It is astounding how a microscopic, single-stranded RNA virus, of less than 200 nanometres in diameter, has wreaked such devastation around the world. Medical experts are divided on how long this crisis will last.
Some hope that the distribution of COVID-19 outbreaks are displaying seasonal patterns, and that warmer weather could suppress the virus. Or new ways are found to enable the quick detection of infection, minimise its spread and effect. Others have cautioned that the virus could be cyclical. Even if its spread was slowed in the next few months, it could return in the form of a stronger variant when temperatures fall in autumn in the Northern Hemisphere.
The global scientific community is racing to find a vaccine. Even at its swiftest the World Health Organization (WHO) has cautioned that we are at least 12 to 18 months away from a viable vaccine. We must therefore do our utmost now – take our circuit breaker measures very seriously, and minimise physical contact among ourselves.
On the economic front, even the most skilful and experienced forecasters have had to repeatedly revise their economic forecasts. The IMF has downgraded its 2020 global growth forecast three times since January 2019. The IMF is releasing a new World Economic Outlook this month and has flagged that a further downgrade is imminent. It expects a recession at least as bad as during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.
The reality is that no one really knows how badly economies will be hurt and how long they will take to recover.
I was serving as Principal Private Secretary (PPS) to then Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew during the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 and learnt much about the root and nature of the crisis from the many discussions that Senior Minister Lee and also at that time Prime Minister Goh had with global experts.
And during the Global Financial Crisis, I was the Managing Director of MAS, at the frontline of a very severe meltdown in global financial markets. This Global Financial Crisis was different from the Asian Financial Crisis, as it originated from the financial system of the most advanced economies – in the US and EU. It was so severe, and the financial system so interconnected that it brought down century-old banks in the US and Europe. Both crises were severe but the root causes were largely financial mismanagement, which were then amplified through an interconnected financial plumbing and the real economy. But targeted solutions subsequently restored confidence.
This time round, the problem is much more complex. Almost every country’s most urgent priority is to slow the outbreak of the virus. To achieve that, half of humanity are now in lockdown.
In the Asian and Global Crises, airlines were still flying, and many activities continued. The sharp fall in aggregate demand this time is severe. Financial markets and the global economy today are far more integrated and interdependent than they were a decade ago. The global supply chain is much more integrated. Action by one country to contain the outbreak disrupts the global supply chain.
The effect of the outbreak is a sharp reduction in global aggregate demand and a widespread disruption to the global supply chain, and this is sending shock waves across the world. Furthermore, the political consensus in many advanced economies is fraying, making decisive responses and coordinated action much harder.
Globally, the situation will get worse before it gets better. But do not get me wrong – I am not a pessimist. There is hope that as the crisis deepens, people around the world will find the need to come together and be single-minded about winning this battle.
As Mr Murali Pillai and Mr Ong Teng Koon indicated yesterday, this is a global crisis that demands global cooperation. I am glad that multilateral institutions – the WHO, IMF, World Bank, as well as the G20, have stepped up to coordinate and manage the multiple dimensions of this crisis. The world must come together and do its utmost to avert catastrophic consequences.
For Singapore, we have to contribute our views and do our part. We are not be a superpower with immense resources, but we should support multilateral institutions in their mission, help build global consensus and do what we can to get through this crisis collectively.
Singapore is feeling the full effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. As an open and globally connected economy, we are deeply impacted by global economic shocks and the effects of border closures. Our aviation industry, for example, is entirely international. Extensive border closures has effectively brought the whole aviation sector to a standstill.
The circuit breaker measures that kick in today will have a severe impact across the whole economy. Until an effective vaccine or treatment is developed, our policies can only seek to mitigate the fall-out. It is difficult to predict when this crisis will be over. This means that we have to plan for the worst and work towards the best.
I shall now turn to the Government's priorities in tackling this crisis. In this fight against COVID-19, our top priority is saving lives, to protect Singaporeans and our families.
We have to keep the rate of infection and transmission low. This is absolutely critical. If we fail in this, our healthcare system will be overwhelmed. If overwhelmed, we will lose more lives, not just from COVID-19, but from other treatable conditions. We must do all we can to support our frontline healthcare workers.
But the more stringent the measures we put in place to keep the number of cases down, the bigger the impact on our economy, as several of you have pointed out. In the immediate term, this is a trade-off between protecting lives and protecting the economy we must all accept – not just in Singapore, but around the world. The alternative of allowing the virus to spread widely enough so that community develop herd immunity will cost too many lives and much more destruction. So let us act decisively now, accept the pain, protect lives, so that we have the strength and vitality to recover faster and thrive in the long-term.
The economy is hit on so many fronts that it is not possible to just restore the status quo. Moreover, as the most open economy in the world, injecting funds cannot counter the extensive global supply and demand shocks.
Our best response now is to build resilience – in our economy and society. That is the approach to the economic and social support in our Resilience Budget and the Solidarity Budget announced yesterday.
For our economy, we build resilience by ensuring that viable businesses are not permanently damaged, but instead, are able to preserve their capabilities to recover. We support businesses with costs, cash flow and credit. We also help affected workers bounce back and to make the best use of this downtime.
For our society, we support our people by saving jobs, providing cash support and easing their cash flow needs, especially of the most vulnerable. As Mr Ong Teng Koon mentioned, we are seeking to ensure that all of us pull through this together and that we leave no one behind.
To this end, while saving lives is our topmost priority, saving jobs comes next. When many people are out of a job, there is a major cost to our individual lives and to society. For individuals, this means depriving them of the chance to gain experience and grow. Minister Josephine Teo set this out well, when she shared why we started the SGUnited Traineeship Scheme for first time job-seekers and students who are graduating from our ITEs, Polytechnics and Universities as well as those returning from overseas.
For companies, if workers are laid off, it means they will become less competitive. Across the economy, the failures of many firms will disrupt the supply chain and drag down the broader economy later. Hence, we have provided high support for wages, by enhancing and extending the Jobs Support Scheme in the Resilience Budget, with a further significant enhancement for the month of April in the Solidarity Budget.
Some Members have also asked if we can do more to help, such as Ms Yip Pin Xiu, for the sports sector. Rest assured that we will continue to monitor the situation closely and do more, as and when we need to, to save jobs.
We can save more jobs, if we have more resilient firms. To help viable firms stay resilient, we have provided support for their cashflow, cost and credit. For this support to work well, it is crucial that all do their part and I am glad many have done so.
On the cash flow front, the Government can provide the support through schemes such as the Jobs Support Scheme. However, the Jobs Support Scheme will fail if firms take a short-term view, pocket the payouts in one month and retrench their workers the next month. I urge businesses to take a longer term view – retain and upskill your workers to accelerate your transformation for the future economy.
In the same vein, the National Wages Council with the support of the tripartite partners, has called for firms to reduce non-wage costs and tap Government support, before resorting to retrenchments. As Secretary-General Ng Chee Meng and his union leaders emphasised repeatedly – firms should cut costs to save jobs and not cut jobs to save costs. Otherwise, firms would have to start from scratch in re-hiring and retraining and may not be able to seize opportunities once the economy recovers.
Ms Jessica Tan and Ms Sylvia Lim asked how we ensure employers receiving JSS payouts continue to retain workers. By design, employers who reduce their employees' wages or put their employees on no-pay leave during this period will have their JSS payouts reduced correspondingly. Conversely, employers who had already done so before the announcements can still bring their workers back onto the payroll. As long as you pay your employees wages and make the necessary CPF contributions, you will receive the corresponding JSS payouts for the relevant months.
MOM and the tripartite partners have released an advisory yesterday to guide employers on salary and leave arrangements that takes into consideration the substantial support from JSS. We will continue to monitor the situation closely with our tripartite partners and take action where needed.
NTUC Secretary-General Ng Chee Meng and Mr Liang Eng Hwa asked if we can flow the assistance to firms even more quickly. Let me assure you that we are trying our best. Agencies like CPF Board and IRAS have redoubled their efforts, working through nights and weekends, to expedite the payouts. Firms on GIRO and PayNow will now start receiving the first JSS payout next week, while those on cheques will start receiving a week later.
Mr Speaker, Sir, may I draw Members' attention to the handouts which describe when businesses and households will receive payouts, please. There will be support flowing every month for the next six months.
The Public Service is also working towards making faster payments to businesses supplying goods and services to the Government. We have brought forward the scheduled due date of more than 1,000 payment vouchers, by an average of 11 days. This amounts to more than $600 million, benefiting close to 300 businesses, mostly SMEs. I encourage businesses that are in better financial positions, to consider making similar gestures for their suppliers, many of which are SMEs. By keeping your supply chain intact, your company will also benefit.
On the cost front, I am heartened to see some property owners passing on the 100% Property Tax Rebate fully to their tenants, by reducing rentals. Some property owners, such as Mapletree Commercial Trust, have even gone further, by giving their tenants more than the Property Tax Rebate that they receive, to share the burden during this time of uncertainty.
Despite these commendable moves, I have received feedback from tenants that some property owners have yet to pass on the Property Tax Rebate to them. This is why we are imposing a legal obligation on property owners to unconditionally pass on to their tenants the full amount of Property Tax Rebate that is attributable to the tenanted properties.
Some property owners commented that such an obligation penalises them. But this move does not make property owners worse-off – in fact it staves off rental terminations and keeps their premises rented out. With a Property Tax Rebate of up to 100%, property owners pay less or even no property tax for the year. Property owners should pass the full tax savings on to their tenants, as the Property Tax Rebate is intended to benefit the tenants.
As Chef Willin Low put it, "Landlords and tenants need each other, like a garden and its plants. When times are good, the garden flourishes with flowers. It is now time for landlords to help tenants so we can wait together for the sunshine to come again."
With this move, I trust that all property owners will do your part, support your tenants and give additional help to tenants who need it. The Government is leading by example, by giving a rental waiver of up to three months for Government-owned properties. This helps about 36,000 tenants.
On the credit front, I enhanced financing support for enterprises in our Resilience Budget and introduced further enhancements yesterday to manage the uncertainty in April, as part of the Solidarity Budget. I am glad that MAS, together with financial institutions, has introduced a package of measures to help SMEs with temporary cash flow difficulties. This is a concern raised by a number of Members, including Mr Murali Pillai, Mr Saktiandi Supaat, Ms Foo Mee Har and Prof Lim Sun Sun. I spoke about these measures in my Ministerial Statement yesterday.
I am glad to see the industry step up and come together to support their customers through this difficult time. I urge businesses to use this support on the 3Cs – Cash, Cost and Credit, to keep things going, while they do a stock-take and make adjustments for what could be a prolonged downturn ahead. I also urge businesses to use the support wisely and responsibly, even as we provide many forms of help in a broad-based manner.
Let me now touch on resilient workers. Our Resilience Budget also focuses on building resilience in our workers. The best form of support is continued employment, both in the immediate and long term. But if your livelihood is affected, we are here to help you through difficult times, to bounce back when conditions improve.
For employees, beyond subsidising wages through the Jobs Support Scheme, we have also provided direct help for workers' training and upskilling, by enhancing course fee subsidies and absentee payroll. For those who lose their jobs, we have stepped up our efforts to help workers find new jobs especially where there are emerging trends, such as through the SGUnited Jobs initiative, which Minister Josephine Teo spoke about yesterday.
For those who experience hardship, we also provide strong social support through new schemes such as the Temporary Relief Fund and COVID-19 Support Grant, as well as through existing schemes like ComCare.
For self-employed persons, we will provide direct cash assistance through the Self-Employed Person Income Relief Scheme, or SIRS.
In implementing this new scheme, we have heard many suggestions such as that from Ms Joan Pereira and Mr Dennis Tan, to improve its auto-inclusion criteria. With the revised eligibility criteria I announced in my Ministerial Statement, a total of about 100,000 self-employed persons will benefit. I also encourage all self-employed persons to make full use of the SEP Training Support Scheme to train and upskill, during this period.
Several Members like Mr Png Eng Huat, Mr Pritam Singh and Assoc Prof Walter Theseira have asked for the Government to relook our approach for support for our low-wage workers, especially during this period. Our union Members of Parliament too, have been consistently championing the needs of our low-wage workers and actively working with the Government to uplift them. This is the right approach, because we need a combination of policies which work together, to shift the entire landscape of support for workers.
The Progressive Wage Model and Workfare, which then-Labour Chief Lim Swee Say is a strong proponent of, have uplifted low-wage workers while keeping unemployment low. Every worker is assured that he can earn more wages through skills upgrading. We continue to believe strongly in that, and have strengthened our SkillsFuture and Next Bound of SkillsFuture movements to allow for this continual progression. I have also heard Mr Henry Kwek's suggestions on sharpening this effort.
We also ensure that our workers are treated fairly by their employers, through the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP). This is made possible by the strong tripartite partnership, that can be a "viable flexible companion to the rigidity of law", as mentioned by Mr Douglas Foo. This model has worked well for our society thus far, and has laid the foundation for good outcomes and trust between the Government, firms and workers over the years.
In supporting our economy, we have sought to provide holistic, integrated support, while keeping an eye on the long term. Beyond subsidising wages, we gave firms the resources to re-engineer their business operations, digitalise, retrain workers and even temporarily redeploy workers in their downtime. This is so that they can emerge stronger once the economy recovers.
Firms have responded well to this. SATS, Changi Airport's biggest ground handling and airline catering operator, is one good example. When I visited Changi Airport last week, I met several SATS employees who will be redeployed to the public and healthcare sectors.
One of them is Ms Neo Xin Yin, a Customer Service Agent, who will become an SG Clean Ambassador with the National Environment Agency. Duty Manager Mr Yazid Izkhairol will be deployed to a public hospital as a care concierge. They are not the only ones. SATS is temporarily redeploying up to 500 workers who will be retrained to support our pandemic response, as part of the SG United Jobs initiative. This is our attempt at "making the perfect match", as called for by Mr Ang Wei Neng, Mr Christopher de Souza and Mr Henry Kwek, who also raised the idea of short-term job creation.
The firm is also pushing ahead with R&D to improve its operations. In collaboration with TUM-CREATE, SATS is trialling AI-powered solutions for cargo handling through the SpeedCargo system. It uses an advanced 3D camera system to scan the dimensions and contents of incoming cargo, before optimising and packing them using a robotic arm system. This is being piloted at Changi Airfreight Terminal.
The aviation sector, including Singapore Airlines, is one of the hardest hit sectors. Minister Khaw Boon Wan spoke on the strategic value of the aviation centre to our position as a Global-Asia Node. Despite being hit so hard, it has found strength, retained staff and pressed on with training and innovation, and volunteered to help others. This is resilience in action.
The Resilience Budget also provides support to increasing resilience in our supply chains. Mr Ang Wei Neng, Mr Saktiandi Supaat, Mr Gan Thiam Poh and Mr Murali Pillai have rightly pointed out that COVID-19 has underscored the importance of further strengthening our supply chain resilience and food security. They have urged us to press on, including on our ambitious “30 by 30” goal to develop our own food production capabilities.
Last Wednesday, I visited Apollo Aquaculture Group and Max Koi Farm, saw what they had achieved and learnt about their plans. Indeed, let us devote attention to this.
In my Ministerial Statement on the Resilience Budget, I spoke about our efforts to deal with the immediate challenges, by having a robust, multi-pronged strategy to ensure a stable supply of safe food and essential items. We have been working on this for years and will continue to do so. Minister Masagos will provide details later this week.
I also thank Mr Seah Kian Peng and his staff of the NTUC group, who have been working hard to keep shelves stocked. Your hard work and that of other distributors instil confidence in the adequacy of our food supplies.
This year’s Budgets also provide direct support for families, with more for the lower income. This is how we support a resilient society. Additional support is available through the Self-Help Groups and Community Development Councils. I thank Members for the various suggestions to do more for our families and households, after listening to the feedback of Singaporeans.
Assoc Prof Walter Theseira, Dr Lim Wee Kiak, Ms Foo Mee Har, Mr Louis Ng and Mr Faisal Manap have requested to provide more cash in hand for different groups of Singaporeans and their families to tide through this period. In fact, we will already be providing more than what the Members have proposed. A 50-year old couple with a child aged 20 years old and below will receive up to $3,200 in cash. This is from the Solidarity Payment, Care and Support Package and PAssion card top-up in cash. Low-wage workers on Workfare will receive an additional $3,000 in cash to help them with their expenses over this period. Singaporeans who become unemployed can receive the COVID-19 Support Grant of $2,400 over three months. In the interim, those who require urgent help with basic living expenses can apply for cash assistance of $500 under the Temporary Relief Fund. MSF and HDB are also exercising greater flexibility under ComCare and for mortgage repayments respectively to provide stronger support. In addition, under the Job Support Scheme, employers will receive up to $31,000 in wage offsets over nine months, for each local worker retained. Eligible self-employed persons will receive $9,000 over the same period under SIRS.
I share Ms Foo Mee Har’s concern that some Singaporean families may have non-citizen members. They currently do not benefit from the cash payouts under the Care and Support Package, but are supporting the family in different ways, through this difficult period. To support these Singaporean families, adult Permanent Residents with Singaporean parents, spouses or children, may apply for a one-off Solidarity Payment of $300. I will also extend this to LTVP+ holders, who are spouses of Singaporeans. More details will be available later.
With this set of schemes, we balance between targeting our support for those who need it more and flowing support quickly to large groups. It is not an easy balance and we will do our best to calibrate this.
That said, I fully support the spirit of Assoc Prof Walter Theseira’s suggestion. Those who have more, should support those who have less. Such solidarity is especially needed in these difficult times. As I mentioned in my Ministerial Statement, some of our support have to be broad-based, so that we can flow the support to our people quickly. I encourage those who do not need the cash payouts to share it with those who need it more, by donating to Giving.sg or the Community Chest’s Courage Fund, or to directly share it with others.
Mr Pritam Singh noted that the Resilience and Solidarity Budgets have features of the New Deal in the US, and went on to ask if we can provide continued support beyond nine months, even after the pandemic subsides. He made a comparison to the “New Deal”, and asked if we should have a "living wage" for our essential services workers, including cleaners.
As Mr Singh himself pointed out, the "New Deal took more than six years and secured the US as a welfare state with a strong federal government and a perennial national debt problem". He went on to say, "the comparison with the New Deal is nonetheless thought provoking".
Indeed, we should think hard about this. While the New Deal was meant to bring the United States out of the Great Depression, its ideas have now polarised American society. We still see this schism today – between liberals who support it for its comprehensive relief and reform programmes, and conservatives who oppose it for being hostile to business and growth.
The United Kingdom went through a similar phase, with their government swinging between the left and right of the political spectrum. I was a student in the United Kingdom in the early 1980s, when Mrs Margaret Thatcher rode to electoral victory when ordinary Britons got fed up with the "Winter of Discontent" in 1978-1979 where there were widespread strikes in the public sector, including the NHS.
As a first-year student of Economics, we had to study economic history, and wrote essays on why the Industrial Revolution started in England. At the same time, I had to do macroeconomics and wrote essays on why the British economy was then de-industrialising, and how economic growth was important for the welfare of workers, and did papers on sociology on class warfare in Britain then.
It is important that in any policy making, we pay attention to the subtle but significant changes in the tone of society, in the attitudes of people and in relationships which will take years to show and which are not easy to reverse.
So, let me caution that in making good public policy, we should be rigorous and clear-headed and not rely on some ideological short-cuts or labels, without thinking deeply about interactions and longer term effects. For our little red dot, we must have the courage and wisdom to do what is right for us – and not rely on simple ideology or fad or fashion of the day. Focus on our people’s well-being, and design systems and support around that core purpose.
For this Government, it has never been a question of whether we “want to spend”. Rather, it is a question of “how do we make the best use of resources to achieve the best outcome for our people”.
As I said in my Round-up speech 39 days ago – and some Members might have forgotten – let me repeat: “There must be a role for the Government to redistribute resources, in the right way, so that everyone shares in the fruits of progress. One way is to do this through schemes that enhance the capability of our people – through investments in education, health and the provision of housing, as well as schemes to mitigate inequality, like Workfare and Silver Support." I also said, "It is not just how much we spend, but how well we spend". I showed various charts showing the outcomes we achieved, in comparison with other countries.
If we stay adaptable, we can keep adjusting our social security system according to the needs of the day. For example, the recent wave of digitalisation has brought great rewards to the innovators, but also put pressures on employment and wages for older workers. We have responded with social support schemes like the Workfare Income Supplement. To help our people tide through immediate challenges in this crisis, we have been adaptable and introduced schemes like SIRS and the COVID-19 Support Grant.
So, let me urge all Members in this House to remain rigorous and clear-headed, and to focus on outcomes for our people. Let us commit to making sure that what we do are fiscally sustainable, not just in this term or next term of government, but for our future generations.
Our ability to put together a support package for Singaporeans amounting to 12% of GDP, without borrowing against our future, is testament to the optimal fiscal balance we have sought to maintain over the years. We will continue to work hard at this and continue to look at improvements. For example, as Dr Intan Mokhtar suggested, we will study whether self-employed persons should be more systematically included in our social security system. And in the same vein, how artists could self-sustain and be well-prepared for the future, as mentioned by Mr Terence Ho. Minister Grace Fu has also shared more on what the Government will do to support this community.
But the Government cannot do this alone. In the spirit of SG Together, I am glad that many are stepping up to help others. The mayors and their five CDCs have stepped up local assistance schemes to support the heartlands and partnering local merchants to do so. These efforts bring warmth and direct assistance to those who need it most. Our charities, IPCs, and Self-Help Groups, have also come forward spontaneously to support Singaporeans in need. I am heartened to see that The Community Foundation of Singapore has launched the Sayang Sayang Fund. The fund aims to boost the morale of frontline healthcare workers with transport vouchers and some cash support. As our schools transition to home-based learning as part of the circuit breaker measures, the Sayang Sayang Fund will also provide disadvantaged students with support for their meals. In just two months, the fund has raised $1.1 million from more than 1,500 donors.
There are many other heartwarming examples of individuals stepping forward, such as that of the provision shop giving out free rice to the needy, mentioned by Mr Vikram Nair. Many Singaporeans have also been helping one another, from distributing hand sanitisers, masks, and even meals, to those who need it more.
Some even offered their homes to Malaysian workers who were affected by the Movement Control Order. Singaporeans are also taking care of the seniors amongst us, a group that Ms Joan Pereira raised. One such example is Mdm Alice Lee. Alice stays in a mature estate where there are many senior residents who have mobility issues, and these seniors faced trouble collecting their masks and hand sanitisers during the collection exercise in February. Alice helped the residents with their collection and delivered to their homes. Alice also took the opportunity to chat with these residents and checked that they are doing fine during this period.
These are spontaneous acts of community support and I hope that they will inspire more to do the same. This is the social cohesion and resilience that we must have.
I have touched on the nature of the crisis and how we must build resilience in our economy and our society. Several Members, like Mr Liang Eng Hwa, Ms Jessica Tan, Mr Gan Thiam Poh, Mr Douglas Foo, have raised this and asked how we can position ourselves better for recovery and emerge stronger. And Mr Mohamad Irshad had just spoken of hope.
Indeed, COVID-19 will re-shape our world and amplify the global structural shifts already underway. With these shifts come risks as well as opportunities. It will accelerate structural shifts in the global supply chains. Global and regional businesses will place a higher premium on locations that offer stability, reliability and effective governance in how they had managed this pandemic. Overall, trust will command a higher premium than ever.
It has also accelerated digitalisation and the adoption of technology in our daily lives. Many more firms, workers and consumers have had the opportunity to embrace new models of remote working, online learning, telemedicine and e-commerce. They will not automatically switch back to their previous habits.
We are in a good position to make the most of these opportunities in a post-COVID world. To do so, we will redouble our efforts to position Singapore as a Global-Asia Node of Technology, Innovation and Enterprise.
I am glad that even during this period, companies have continued to engage Singapore on new projects and the development of new capabilities. Just last week, Hyundai announced its opening of an innovation lab in the Jurong Innovation District to develop and test technology across the automotive supply chain and trial electric vehicle manufacturing.
In the same week, ExxonMobil also held a virtual foundation laying ceremony to deploy new technology to upgrade its integrated refining and petrochemical complex. This is expected to create 135 new jobs.
We will also press on with our Smart Nation and R&D efforts. We will continue building smart towns like our Punggol Digital District and our efforts in deploying Autonomous Vehicles. We are now formulating our next five-year masterplan for Research, Innovation and Enterprise, or RIE 2025. And we will prepare our people for this. Under the SGUnited Traineeships Programme, NRF will work with MOM to provide more than 500 traineeships across the RIE eco-system, including our R&D labs, as well as deep-tech start-ups, accelerators and incubators.
We will also continue to press on with business transformation and upskilling of our workers, even during this downtime, in fact, especially, during this downtime. As Mr Douglas Foo, Senior Parliamentary Secretary Low Yen Ling and Ms Tin Pei Ling stressed, businesses need to take the opportunity to transform now, as the post-COVID-19 landscape will be vastly different. Indeed, Mr Douglas Foo astutely pointed out that had our businesses been further along the digitalisation curve prior to the outbreak, the transition to remote work arrangements and moving operations online would have been less painful and better executed. Senior Parliamentary Secretary Low Yen Ling has shared what we are doing to support firms with flexible work arrangements.
The COVID-19 fight still has a long way to go, and things will get tougher; it will get worse before they improve. But one way or another, eventually it will pass – not next week, not next month, but perhaps within a year or two. As Dr Lim Wee Kiak put it, it is an invisible threat, but it is not invincible.
The question we should ask ourselves even now is when that day comes, what sort of world will it be and how ready Singapore will be to march forward again.
We should think ahead on how we can deepen economic and social resilience. In this spirit, we will set up two initiatives – an Emerging Stronger Task Force on economic resilience and a new emphasis on social resilience under the Singapore Together Movement.
I earlier announced that I would set up an Emerging Stronger Task Force under the ambit of the Future Economy Council, to help our economy bounce back from the crisis. Minister Desmond Lee and Mr Tan Chong Meng, Group CEO of PSA International, will co-chair this task force, to review how Singapore will stay economically resilient and build new sources of dynamism in a post-COVID world. This task force will report to the Future Economy Council and I hope that this can speak to Ms Rahayu Mahzam’s call for a coordinated effort to recover from the crisis.
The Singapore Together Movement, led by Ministers Indranee Rajah and Desmond Lee, has been seeking to tap on the creative energies and commitment of Singaporeans, and friends of Singapore, to shape a better future. COVID-19 has reinforced the importance of social and psychological resilience. As President Halimah pointed out at the start of this session, the worst of times can bring out the best in our people. How we respond to it, how our nation comes together, will show much about our values as a people and the principles we hold dear.
Let us use this crisis period well. Ministers Indranee and Desmond will mobilise Singaporeans to explore how we can deepen our social fabric and partnerships between Government and people in Singapore, and between Singaporeans and people around the world. This will be a whole-of-nation effort, which will take our collective energies and ideas to do well. To do so, as I have mentioned before, we will have a series of national challenges across different domains to encourage ground-up participation.
One of the first challenges we will have is the "Singapore Together Stay Home for Singapore Challenge". I am asking all of us to be a part of it. These four weeks of circuit breaking will feel unusual and unnatural. The challenge is to help ourselves and others stay home, and do so purposefully and positively.
As we stay home, how might we thrive, by staying healthy and learning? How might we connect with our loved ones and the community? How might we help others? How might we get help?
This will be a time for reflection, to learn something new, bond with loved ones, to show care and support for one another, and do something active and constructive for the community.
There are existing resources available to all Singaporeans. For example, you can tap on online resources from the National Library Board and the National Heritage Board to learn new things and connect with your loved ones.
Some Singaporeans will also be emotionally affected or distressed in this period, as pointed out by Mr Alex Yam, Mr Mohamed Irshad and Ms Anthea Ong. If you need additional help, you can get help from various platforms, such as the National Care Hotline, or from our community partners. We are putting together some resources, and Ministers Desmond and Indranee will speak more about them soon.
We are entering uncharted waters in the fight against the COVID-19 outbreak and we cannot predict with precision how long this will be. But at this point, let me share some personal reflections with Members on what we need to pull through.
I presented the Unity Budget to this Chamber on 18 February. Thirty-seven days later, on 26 March, I presented the Resilience Budget. And 11 days later, yesterday, I presented our Solidarity Budget. Three Budgets, within just 48 days. We are dedicating close to $60 billion, amounting to 12% of our GDP, to deal decisively with the situation at hand. The three Budgets make up our largest Budget in any one financial year, in dollar amount and as a percentage of GDP. This is the largest spending in any financial year in our nation’s history.
We also incurred the largest deficit ever – $44.3 billion, or 8.9% of our GDP. As Ms Tin Pei Ling observed, this deficit alone is half of our total spending in the preceding financial year.
We had to seek the President’s approval to draw on our past reserves, not once, but twice. In total, the President has given her in-principle support for the Government to draw up to $21 billion from our past reserves for the Resilience Budget and the Solidarity Budget. Once again, I thank the President for her deep understanding of the nature of this crisis, and for her support. I also thank the Chairman and members of the Council of Presidential Advisers.
As Finance Minister, I am extremely grateful that we have been able to tap on the deep financial reserves – our current and past reserves which have been so carefully built up, invested and managed. This has allowed us to respond to the crisis without having to borrow and without burdening our future generations with repayment obligations.
But just exactly how deep are our reserves? Mr Pritam Singh has asked this question time and again in this House. Members would know that our reserves comprise assets invested by MAS, GIC and Temasek. MAS and Temasek publish the size of the funds they invest. It is the size of the funds invested by GIC that is not published.
We do not disclose the total size of our reserves for the sake of national security and strategic interests. As a small country without any natural resources and highly dependent on imports, our reserves are vital to our overall economic and financial stability and our well-being. They provide a key defence for Singapore in times of crisis.
I have shared with Members that, during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, the late President SR Nathan approved the provision of $150 billion from our past reserves to guarantee bank deposits in Singapore. This move calmed our depositors and we did not have a single bank run during that very difficult period. All our depositors' monies were safe. In 2009, President Nathan approved a draw of $4.9 billion from the past reserves to fund the Resilience Package then, to help us overcome the crisis. Having our reserves therefore played a key role in helping us emerge stronger from that crisis. In fact, our economy rebounded quickly.
Our reserves serve as a strategic defence. It gives us the wherewithal to resolutely defend the Singapore dollar against speculative attacks. This contributes to a stable Singapore dollar, which in turn bolsters the confidence of investor and citizens. Our reserves are thus no different from SAF's arsenal. No country’s armed forces will ever tell you exactly how much ammunition and weaponry they really have. To do so is to betray valuable intelligence to potential adversaries. This is obviously not a wise defence strategy and likewise should not be adopted for our financial reserves.
What Members should focus on are the policies and programmes, especially those which may require the use of reserves. Debate the merits of these programmes, including the expenditure required for them. But let us be clear – it is neither in the interest of Singapore or Singaporeans to repeatedly ask about the size of our reserves.
We are in the middle of a storm and I am very disappointed that Mr Pritam Singh has used this occasion to raise this question again. Mr Pritam Singh also asked how we will ensure sustainable finances in the next term of government. He suggested that we review our usage of past reserves in view of the longer term impact of COVID-19.
Many have urged us, year after year, to spend more of our reserves to fund our growing expenditure, suggesting that we do not need to save so much or to ever raise taxes. But like Mr Liang Eng Hwa said, we kept the discipline and stuck to our principle of using the returns from our reserves in a prudent manner.
We do not view the reserves as a piggy bank to be broken at will, to provide the Government with a convenient source of additional revenue. We avoided running deficits in good years and consistently saved. If we had succumbed to the political pressure to spend more of our reserves in good years, we would not have had the war chest to deal with critical moments, such as now; and to do even more, if necessary, even in the next term of government.
But the aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak will be with us for a long time and we will need to deal with it on a sustainable basis. If the crisis deepens, our economy and revenues will shrink, and we may have to make use of our past reserves again for a recovery. While we must make plans – and we are – at this hour, let us all focus our minds fully on making the best use of this very unprecedented Budget to build social and economic resilience. And if there is a need, we have the institution of the Government and the Elected President to decide on how best to use our resources to manage a crisis.
So, indeed, this crisis has reaffirmed the value of our key institutions and the key tenets of our prudent fiscal policy – to spend prudently, invest wisely and plan consistently for the long term.
Beyond our financial reserves, I am grateful that we have been able to tap on the deep reserves of strength and resourcefulness of our people. Without the strength, resourcefulness, trust of our people, all the right measures will not be worth the dollar tag on them. But with these, our combined strength is worth so much more.
Our healthcare workers, Home Team officers, cleaners and many other unsung heroes have carried out their duties with commitment and courage. They have had a very tough time. They have to stay alert and careful while working long hours and over weekends. It is very moving that our people recognise this and pour out strong support for them.
Many Singaporeans have made videos and written letters of appreciation to spur our frontline workers – students and staff from Yew Tee Primary School, who made personalised cards and a video to show support and appreciation for the frontline staff of various hospitals and our Police officers. And there are many others like them.
Just last week, applause rang across our heartlands at 8.00 pm on 30 March as Singaporeans came together to give those on the frontline a round of applause as part of our "Clap for #SGUnited" campaign. This applause was also for everyone who has been helping to keep Singapore safe during this tough time.
Indeed, our national stock of resilience is made up of all our individual stocks of resilience. Ultimately, the long-drawn fight against the virus will be won by us standing together as one united people. Cases are creeping up and, as Mr Vikram Nair put it, we must each do our part. This is absolutely serious – a matter of life and death.
This has been an extremely hectic period for me, Minister Lawrence Wong and Minister Indranee Rajah, and all my Cabinet colleagues. I am grateful to my staff in MOF, many of them young or with young families. They have been working tirelessly for almost 10 weeks now – from Pongal, to Valentine's Day, to Chinese New Year, and over many weekends. It is the first time that MOF officers have had to prepare three Budgets within 48 days.
It is not only hectic. It has been emotional. We know what is at stake. Our lives, our livelihoods, our loved ones. Our home and nation.
I know people like to call us at MOF bean-counters because we are always counting the costs and benefits of things. We count because you count. We weigh up our reserves of strength, measure out the right actions to help our people and businesses, pace ourselves to go the distance and save for the future. We count to protect our people and our home.
I thank my staff and my colleagues for running this race together with me. I could not have asked for a better team. And I thank their families for their understanding. You should be very proud of your loved ones who are giving their everything in the Public Service.
I also thank Members of the House who bring their honesty and resilience not only into this Chamber but also into our fight on all fronts against COVID-19. I am especially heartened that fellow Singaporeans and Members of Parliament show strong values and commitment to our future. Let me just share a few examples.
After I announced the Resilience Budget, Ms Tan wrote to me, saying that she is touched that we are tapping into the reserves built up by earlier generations. She then went on to urge that we must work to put back what we are going to use so that future generations have emergency funds for the next crisis. Several others also did so.
Members such as Dr Chia Shi-Lu and Ms Tin Pei Ling have also come forward to urge us not to spend in an unbridled fashion from the reserves, even in today's situation.
Indeed, as we draw down on our reserves to tackle this generational crisis of unprecedented scale, we must uphold our responsibility to steward our reserves properly in our time for the benefit of our future generations.
Yesterday, Minister Khaw Boon Wan shared the story of his Primary 2 granddaughter who have been urging his wife and their helper to put on masks and to observe safe distancing. And less than 24 hours ago, when I was here in this Chamber delivering the Solidarity Budget, a young mother was at home watching it live together with her daughter. The mother later wrote to me saying that, afterwards, her daughter asked her, "Will Singapore become bankrupt?" I was surprised and glad that her daughter and Minister Khaw's granddaughter could understand such values at such a young age.
As adults, let us uphold our values and not let our children and future generations down. It is precisely for them that my team and I are determined to exercise fiscal discipline and prudence.
The mother who wrote to me asked for an answer for her daughter. Will Singapore become bankrupt? No. We will never let Singapore become bankrupt.
The Spanish Flu occurred in 1918 and COVID-19, in 2019. A hundred years from now, should there be another unprecedented crisis, will Singapore have the wherewithal to tackle it? It depends critically on the values of our people, and I am grateful to Singaporeans like Ms Tan for reminding us all of our responsibility. Mr Speaker, Sir, before I conclude, allow me to say a few words in Mandarin.
(In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] To deal with the COVID-19 outbreak, we announced three Budgets within a short span of two months. The amount committed is unprecedented. The purpose is to protect enterprises, protect jobs and secure our future. The measures to deal with the COVID-19 outbreak is worth about $60 billion, which makes up about 12% of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and the accumulated fiscal deficit is $44.3 billion.
COVID-19 is the gravest challenge for our generation. The healthcare, economic and social fronts are interacting in complex ways. It is very hard to predict what is going to happen.
As such, we have introduced decisive and wide-ranging measures. For example, in order to protect enterprises, we introduced property tax and rental rebates to help enterprises cut their cost; to protect jobs, we introduced the Jobs Support Scheme to help enterprises cope with cash flow problems and avoid retrenching their local employees. In addition, we have also introduced the Self-Employed Person Income Relief Scheme (SIRS) to help the self-employed. We have also enhanced the Care and Support Package to lighten the burden of cost of living for our people.
Because the outbreak is still evolving, we will make adjustments along the way, based on public feedback and as the situation develops.
Today, we have the ability to deal decisively with this outbreak because the Singapore Government has been saving for rainy days and practising fiscal prudence for years. The Government has fiscal surplus and we also have the reserves to back us up. The Government has obtained in-principle support from President Halimah to tap on as much as $21 billion from our reserves. Here, I would like to express my gratitude to the President.
Earlier, I mentioned the Chinese saying "前人种树,后人乘凉". Our reserves are like the trees planted by our ancestors. Today, these trees can not only shade us during sunny days, but also shield us from thunderstorms. This has enabled us to deal with the imminent challenges without having to borrow and leaving the next generation debt-laden.
The Government will do its best, but I hope that everyone will also do his part, mutually support each other to overcome this crisis.
In the past two months, our healthcare workers, the Home Team and frontline workers have been working tirelessly around the clock to fight this virus. We would like to thank them for their hard work and contributions. This is a critical moment for all of us to join them on the frontline.
Every Singaporean must be socially responsible. We must not do three things: do not panic, do not go out and do not spread rumours. We keep emphasising these because these are important means to curb the spread of the virus and protect our people. If we unwittingly get infected and subsequently infect our family members and friends, causing them to lose their health or even life, then we will be left with only deep regrets.
In the workplace, businesses should also take care of their workers and retain jobs.
COVID-19 is relentless but there is warmth in society. Various charitable organisations, IPCs, self-help groups and volunteers have all extended a helping hand to people in need. With the ongoing outbreak, I hope that more Singaporeans can step forward and show that we care.
We have built deep mutual trust between our leaders and the people over the years. People trust the current Government, allowing us to implement measures to ensure their safety. I hope that Singaporeans will continue to work with the Government and strengthen the Singapore Spirit.
Earlier, we launched the Singapore Together movement and set up the Emerging Stronger Taskforce. We will continue to work on areas, such as research and development (R&D), economic transformation, skills training and improving social cohesion to prepare for the future.
Our pioneers have encountered many turbulences during nation building. They have toiled together to overcome various challenges. Similarly, this current crisis will have a profound impact on our generation. So long as we stay united, protect our health, jobs, enterprises, livelihoods and secure our future, we will overcome this crisis.
When our children and grandchildren look back on this moment, they will see how this generation has stood United, Resilient, and in Solidarity to overcome this crisis together and emerged stronger.
(In English): I will now conclude in English. We have managed to weather this crisis so far because of our world-class healthcare system, our strong finances, our administrative capacity, our strong tripartite partnership and most importantly, our exceptional people. These were not built overnight. These require long-term planning, deliberate investment, stewardship of resources and careful build-up of capabilities.
This is only possible because of the values that this Government and our people have upheld across generations, which has allowed us to fight the crisis from a position of strength. These are the values of discipline, prudence and long-term thinking.
The journey ahead to the end of this crisis will likely still be long and uncertain. But my team and I will continue to stay vigilant and partner Singaporeans and people around the world. Difficult decisions will need to be made during this period and so, we will do so with Singaporeans' interests at heart. We will get through this together.
Let us stand united, resilient and in solidarity. Singapore together, Majulah forever! [Applause.]
Clarifications. Mr Pritam Singh.
Thank you, Mr Speaker. I would like to thank the Deputy Prime Minister for his comments. I just have a quick follow-up on the point he made about the reserves and why Singaporeans, including myself, keep asking questions in this House about those numbers.
I think, at the start, I have to make a point which is, the Opposition in this House is also is a steward. We are also a steward of the reserves and the expenditure priorities of the Government because these things are something all of us have to take ownership of.
But we seek these numbers because when the Government introduces policies where reserves have to be employed, the question we have to ask ourselves is, is it enough or is it too much also, because that is a relevant question too. Or is it too little?
I think these are the reasons why some of these numbers, some of these issues keep coming up. Certainly not to make life difficult for the Ministry of Finance and its team in this moment. But that is our duty.
I understand the Deputy Prime Minister has made the allusion to the SAF and you do not reveal your deep capabilities but I am pretty sure that we can nuance that position. Two Budgets ago, I brought a Business Times article and showed it to the House; some Singaporeans were wondering whether you could look at some part of the reserves which could be used to improve conditions for Singaporeans, improve the livelihood of Singaporeans while there could be another component which may have to remain secret.
So, there are modalities to consider some of these numbers and how we can have a more deeper conversation about them.
Mr Speaker, Sir, first, for Mr Singh, I am glad that he supports the importance of our reserves and he asked first, "Are we spending too much or not enough?" And as I have said earlier, it is right and proper that we debate the Budget in this House, which is what we have been doing.
He referred to the Business Times article and said, "Can we spend some of it to improve the livelihoods of our people?"
We have our spending rules in the form of the Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC), and the NIRC, is as I had indicated in my previous Budget Statement is now the single largest component of spending, more than corporate income tax, more than personal income tax; in fact, more than GST and in fact, more than any other category of taxes.
So, do we have proper spending rules? Yes. I recall Mr Singh asking, "Why not spend more?" This was debated in the House when the spending rules came about earlier on and when we increased the spending by including Temasek into the overall framework. So, Mr Singh can just check the number that we have been spending from NIRC over the years, and that would tell him how much we are spending.
Mr Singh also alluded to whether there are proper checks and balances. And this is exactly what our Elected Presidency is about. Let me share with this House that before I table a Supply Bill in Parliament, I first have to inform the President as to whether I will be touching the past reserves.
And when the Auditor-General has completed his audit, I have to sign, in my name, a letter to the President, confirming whether the Government had touched the past reserves in the last Budget.
So, the checks and balances that we have in our system have been very rigorously designed and very well observed. I can tell you that even in presenting this Budget, when making the Government's case to the President and the Council Presidential Advisers, I spent a lot of time explaining the details and I can tell you that the President and CPA asked very, very good questions, much more than systems that I have seen elsewhere. And certainly much better than the debts that have been incurred in so many other countries. So, let us do this carefully, Mr Singh.
Any other clarifications? Mr Louis Ng.
I thank you, Sir. I have four clarifications. One, can I just check whether we can extend the COVID-19 Support Grant to those who are also on unpaid leave? Second, could I ask whether we can introduce a COVID-19 related childcare leave, specifically only for those workers who are in the essential work and the key economic sectors?
I also had a question about the foreign workers living in the dorms. I am just wondering whether we can do the swab test, especially for those who have lived in close proximity to those who were infected. I think many are very worried that they are infected at this point.
The last question really is can I just confirm that the $300 that we are giving out to Singapore and parents will include the single unwed parents as well.
I thank Mr Louis Ng for your questions. You have asked four rather technical questions. And as I said, this Budget has been prepared in a record time. So, there will be details that the different Ministries will announce later and this will be sorted out by the different Ministries.
Mr Png Eng Huat
This question is for the Minister of State Zaqy Mohamad. I just want to seek clarity on whether these two groups of Self-employed Person qualify for the COVID-19 Support Grant or SIRS. Those SEPs who are not on the Workfare radar, who do not contribute to their CPF, but they do file their income tax returns. The second group is SEP who are not on Workfare CPF or income tax radar, but they do have documented proof of their livelihood status. And last but not least is there a contact point for these people to make an appeal. Thank you.
I thank the Member for his questions. As the Deputy Prime Minister said, the Budget has been set up in record time. So, there will be details that will be forthcoming and the good thing is that NTUC has volunteered to look into appeals and manage the appeals administration. So, the email address and contact details hotline will be provided soon. In the meantime, just hang on there and we will give you more details once ready.
Minister Grace Fu
Mr Speaker, may I have your permission to address the question that had been asked by Mr Dennis Tan on the arts charities issue.
Carry on, please.
Mr Dennis Tan asked if arts charities will be eligible for the Job Support Scheme and other kinds of support they are eligible for. I am pleased to confirm that all charities including arts charities are eligible for the JSS as long as they have made CPF contributions for their local employees.
All charities which are tenants in MCCY-owned properties will benefit from two months' rental waivers. The arts charities can also apply to the schemes under the Arts and Cultural Resilience Package including the Capability Development Scheme for the arts and the Digital Presentation Grant for the arts. They may also avail themselves of broad-based measures to support charities in general. For example, they can apply for the VWOs-Charities Capability Fund (VCF) and obtain funding support of up to 80% to attend training courses and engage external consultants to improve key governance and management areas.
In view of the challenges presented by COVID-19, we recently expanded the VCF scope to include funding for online training courses, audio and video-conferencing tools and enhanced the funding quantum for charities who outsource their payroll, finance and accounting functions.
We understand that charities operations may be under additional strain and some have difficulties holding their AGM to finalise their financial statements. Therefore, the Commissioner of Charities has also granted an extension for all charities' annual submissions due during the period of 31 March 2020 to 31 July 2020, for three months. There is no need for these charities to seek extension separately.
Minister Lawrence Wong
Mr Speaker, with your permission, I would like to address some queries raised not so much on the Budget because there were some queries asked about dorms and also about masks.
Please proceed.
So, Mr Louis Ng asked about the management of dorms and whether more can be done to test workers. I would like to clarify and assure everyone that the task force is putting in place a whole series of measures to manage the infection in our foreign worker dorms. That includes taking steps to move out workers in some of these dorms to other areas so that we can better manage them, ensure compliance with all the safe-distancing measures within the dorms. And yes, it also includes stepping up of tests of workers in these dorms. So, to Mr Louis Ng's specific question, we will be doing more to test the workers there as well.
Mr Leon Perera also asked about the mask distribution exercise. He mentioned that the last time we did a surgical mask distribution exercise, he had asked whether it could be done through the mail and I had explained that we preferred for people to pick up at collection points because not everyone would need the masks and we wanted to conserve the masks. And so he said since this is now reusable masks, why not do it through mail rather than have people collect the masks. I would again like to clarify the task force did consider the different ways in which we can put out the masks to Singaporeans as quickly as possible and also safely. When we changed and updated the guidance for masks, our priority was to ensure that the reusable masks could be released to Singaporeans quickly and safely. If we were to do it through the mail system, actually it would have taken quite some time – maybe up to a week or more.
But we have a system in place through the collection points where people can come down to collect and we can put in place on the procedures for fast, efficient and safe collection. And indeed that has been the case. So immediately upon the update of the guidance on mask on Friday, on Sunday the collection points were all activated nationwide.
From experience, or look at what has happened so far. People have come forward. They have collected the masks. The time they took to pick up the masks was very quick. So, the entire conduct of this has been fast, efficient and safe. And to-date, more than 2.8 million masks have already been collected. So, we again appreciate SAF, the PA and all our many volunteers who have been activated, who have stepped forward to enable this collection exercise to be done promptly and safely.
Ms Foo Mee Har
I thank Deputy Prime Minister for including non-Singaporeans in Singaporean families in the cash payment.
I would like to ask the Deputy Prime Minister in his expectations. I appreciate it is technical and there is a lot of things going on at the same time, but I did raise a question for the Deputy Prime Minister in my speech. The Temporary Bridging Loan interest rate capped is as high as 5%. But I am very grateful to hear the Deputy Prime Minister announcing risk share to 90%, and that banks and finance company will also get support from MAS with the new Singapore dollar facility. So, even though I asked the Deputy Prime Minister for a prescribed interest rate, given that there is so much help by the Government, I would just like to ask Deputy Prime Minister if you cannot give me a number, do you have the expectation given all this help that the bank should now be able to provide a much lower interest rate to help SMEs to tide over and not let them have unnecessary debt burden when they recover.
I thank Ms Foo for her question. As to what the banks would do, as I have announced, the MAS has been getting the financial system together to provide a whole range of support including a Singapore dollar facility and the conditions for using the facility. So, this will take some time for them to sort it out. But I believe that, as I said before, if we are in this together and it is in the interest of the banks to provide support for their lenders just as in the interest of landlords to provide the support. While at the same time, of course, adhering to the risk management that they have always been practising.
But this is an extraordinary time and I believe that this will be worked out between the banks, MAS and the borrowers.
I have a question and I do not know whether it should go to the Deputy Prime Minister, Minister Lawrence Wong or Minister Desmond Lee. I mentioned that in my speech about my concerns for the rental flat communities in terms of the overcrowding, especially given how we have been alerted to the danger of infection with overcrowding in the clusters that we found in dormitories.
Mr Speaker, I think the basic advice we give to everyone, whether living in your own flat or living in a rental flat is quite straightforward. If you are not sick, then it is all right, I mean, if you live together. But as so long as you start feeling unwell, even if it is a cough, sore throat, then you do not continue to interact even with your own family members; immediately go and see a doctor. And then, at that stage, you should self-isolate even from your own family members and take necessary precautions. So, that is the basic advice.
If all the family members are feeling all right, then it is fine. It is not as though they have to minimise interactions amongst themselves. As a family, I am sure you will still be coming into contact. But it is upon the time when somebody starts to feel unwell, then you should really start to take precautions. So, it is on that basis that safe distancing applies within the household.
Indeed, if there are members, whether in a sold flat, 3-room flat, 4-room flat or in a rental flat, if there are Singaporeans who find difficulty doing this sort of a self-isolation because of the size of their family and the physical environment that they are in, then they can contact us and we will see how best to help them including providing additional housing support.
Any other clarifications? Pursuant to Standing Order 44(2), the Motion to consider the Ministerial Statement on Additional Support Measures in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic lapses at the conclusion of debate. Leader.