Debated in Parliament on 1 Mar 2017.
Mr Leon Perera asked the Minister for Communications and Information what criteria are used to determine the selection of falsehoods corrected on the Gov Factually website.
Factually aims to clarify widespread or common misperceptions of Government policy or incorrect assertions on matters of public concern that can harm Singapore's social fabric.
Over the years, the site has addressed inaccurate assertions about various matters, such as housing, the economy and finance. During the Zika outbreak, we allayed public misperceptions about the virus. This is part of the Government's efforts to ensure Singaporeans have access to accurate information on important matters.
Factually, as its name suggests, concerns itself with facts, not opinions.
Mdm Speaker: Mr Leon Perera.
I thank the Minister for his answer. Just one supplementary question; maybe this is just a confirmation. The process that Factually follows to decide which issues to talk about, is that process fundamentally about collecting feedback from various Ministries, Government agencies and Statutory Boards? Or has Factually in the past and will it in the future, be open to feedback from other non-government organisations to address on the website?
Madam, the Member is correct that we do source the information and the claims from various sources within the Government and also from outside the Government. In fact, periodically, we do public engagement exercises and sessions, and during these sessions, some concerns may be raised by members of the public and we will look into them. If we think there is enough of interest in that subject matter that has purveyed some misperceptions, we will clarify.