Details of Accounting Lapses in People's Association

The Minister for Manpower (Mr Lim Swee Say)(for the Minister for Culture, Community and Youth): Mdm Speaker, the Auditor-General's Office (AGO) audited the People's Association (PA) and the Grassroots Organisations' (GROs) compliance with the financial rules set by PA for GROs.

First, on tenancy contracts. PA's financial rules allow Community Club Management Committees (CCMCs) to seek the approval of PA headquarters (HQ) for the waiver of competition for the award of tenancy contracts where they have valid reasons to do so for the benefit of residents. Unfortunately, there were 13 tenancy contracts cited by AGO for

Page: 22

waiver of competition without prior approval from PA HQ. These are:

(a) five contracts by two community clubs (CCs) with poor locations to provide children enrichment, food and entertainment services. One CC is in a housing estate under redevelopment and the other is in a new housing estate in its early stage of development;

(b) one contract for the installation of an automated teller machine (ATM) by a particular local bank to complement ATMs of two other local banks in the neighbourhood;

(c) one contract for the renewal and continuation of childcare services for the convenience of the parents and their children;

(d) three contracts for the introduction of new community lifestyle concepts to encourage family bonding and to inject vibrancy in the neighbourhood;

(e) two contracts for food outlets that are popular with heartlanders, including youths and families with young children; and

(f) one contract for a non-profit community organisation that promotes healthy lifestyles, in particular, for senior residents.

Notwithstanding the good intentions of the CCMCs in bringing in these services for the benefit of the residents and that they had benchmarked the rental rates offered against similar rental rates in the area, they did contravene the financial rules of PA in not seeking prior approval from PA HQ for the waiver of tender.

PA acknowledges our shortcomings in this area and has taken immediate steps to enhance compliance.

The second area is with regard to claims by a Citizens' Consultative Committee (CCC) chairman. The seven claims made by the chairman of a CCC to himself were:

(a) one case of immediate financial assistance for a needy family at a funeral wake;

(b) a working dinner and an appreciation dinner for volunteers and community partners; and

(c) four claims for workplan retreats.

Page: 23

The claim for financial assistance presented to the needy family at a funeral wake had no supporting document. However, the amount presented to the family was witnessed by a few other volunteers who were present.

The two claims for the working and appreciation dinners were supported by receipts. As for the four claims related to two workplan retreats, one had supporting documents. Even though the original receipts for the other three claims amounting to $56,050 were misplaced, the CCC had subsequently verified the amounts claimed with proof of payment from the vendor.

Although there was no evidence of dishonesty, the CCC chairman concerned has taken personal responsibility for these lapses and resigned from his position.

Madam, as a Statutory Board managing public funds, PA takes our financial governance seriously. Our accounts are subject to annual statutory audits. The last time our accounts received an adverse opinion was for FY2012. The adverse opinion was issued not for financial irregularity, but because the GROs' accounts were not included in PA's financial statements. PA has since consolidated all the GROs' accounts into our financial statements. We have received clean opinions for our FY2013 and FY2014 financial statements.

This AGO audit is over and above our annual audits. By having multiple layers of checks and transparency, we ensure a high level of vigilance over the integrity of our financial management. While we cannot completely eradicate human error, being vigilant means these are the exceptions rather than the norm.

AGO is doing its job and has done an impartial audit. PA takes the AGO findings seriously. We have taken swift and decisive action to put things right immediately. When things go wrong, we do not shy away from taking responsibility and tough action to put things in order.

Mdm Speaker, I just have three questions. Just now, the Minister said that there was documented proof for one claim. So, the AGO's Report is wrong, as the Minister was trying to say that there is actually one claim where there are no supporting documents.

The second question is about sample size. There are about 1,800 GROs. Can the Minister share what is the sample size and how many were audited? The third question is about the adverse opinion that PA got due to the GRO accounts which were not cited, not presented or included in the PA accounts, and that was why the auditor gave it the adverse opinion.

Page: 24

But the Minister said that there were no irregularities. How does the Minister know that, because the auditor has not seen the GRO accounts?

Mdm Speaker, first of all, let me correct the point brought up by Mr Png. It is that of the four claims, only one had supporting document; three did not at the point of claim. Subsequent to the observation by AGO, the CCC went back to the vendors to retrieve the evidence of payment. In other words, there was a lapse in the procedure, but they have rectified that by verifying the claims with the vendors.

Secondly, sample size. Mdm Speaker, PA has no decision over the sample size. In fact, all these are decided by AGO. However, it is in the interest of PA to ensure that these lapses are isolated in some cases and not widespread across the whole organisation. The GRO accounts have been subject to internal audits every year by public auditors appointed by PA. In other words, it is not that the accounts have not been audited all these years; it is not that it is being subject to this sort of audit for the first time. So, I think it is important to highlight that we do not depend on AGO to audit our accounts. PA, as a grassroots movement, has been doing its internal audits for all GROs all these years. And since 2012, we have consolidated all accounts into PA's accounts and subject the whole account for external auditing.

Thirdly, Mr Png asked about the adverse opinion and irregularity. It is important that Mr Png recognise what Deputy Prime Minister Tharman said earlier. There are two different types of audit. One is about auditing the accuracy, the reliability of your financial statements, of your accounting system. That is the function of an external audit conducted by the external auditor. The second type of auditing is about compliance, the compliance audit. For the GRO, as I had mentioned earlier, all our GRO accounts have been subject to internal audits all these years. That is the reason why I say it with confidence that there was no irregularity at the systems level.