Debated in Parliament on 14 Jan 2013.
Mr Laurence Lien asked the Acting Minister for Manpower (a) for an update on the implementation of the Workfare Income Supplement Scheme, specifically, (i) the total number of recipients in each of the last five years; and (ii) the total disbursements, in cash and to the recipient's CPF accounts, in each of the last five years; and (b) what the considerations are for reviewing its adequacy.
The Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) scheme was introduced in 2007 to supplement the wages and CPF savings of low-income workers, as well as to encourage them to work regularly. Employees receive WIS in cash and in their CPF accounts in the ratio of 1:2.5. Self-employed persons receive WIS entirely in their CPF Medisave account. The number of WIS recipients and the total amount of WIS due to them for work done from 2007 to 201118 are in Tables 1 and 2 below:
Page: 175
WIS targets full-time income earners in the bottom 20% but benefits are extended (at reducing rates) to cover earners up to around the 30th percentile. In 2010, WIS was enhanced, with both its payout quantum and income cap increased. In 2012, the payment frequency to employees was increased from twice to four times a year. MOM will review WIS in 2013.
In reviewing WIS, we will take into account changes in income levels and inflation, bearing in mind that the level of assistance should be meaningful yet continue to encourage individual effort and responsibility. It is also important to continue striking an appropriate balance between giving recipients cash to help with their immediate needs and CPF to help with their retirement adequacy. WIS is a permanent social transfer mechanism. Ensuring it is structured to be effective while fiscally sustainable, and targeted at those who need it most are, therefore, also important considerations.
In helping low-income workers, a holistic approach is adopted. WIS is an important component but only one of several schemes aimed at helping the individuals and their families. ComCare and Medifund, for example, play critical roles in supporting this group of Singaporeans as well.
Page: 176