Debated in Parliament on 7 May 2026.
Ms He Ting Ru asked the Minister for Education in relation to the usage of artificial intelligence tools by educators in Institutes of Higher Learning for grading and assessment purposes (a) what safeguards govern accuracy, bias, confidentiality of student data and human oversight in the final marking decision; and (b) .
[Please refer to "Guidelines Encouraging Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Schools", Official Report, 24 September 2025, Vol 96, Issue 4, Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer not Answered by End of Question Time section.]
In line with MOE's guidelines, the IHLs use AI for assessment in a careful and calibrated manner. Before being deployed, AI grading tools are validated for reliability to ensure that the assessment outcomes reflect the intended mastery by students. More importantly, educators retain responsibility for the final grading decision by remaining in-the-loop during the assessment process and reviewing individual assessment outcomes. Educators must also inform their students when AI is used in assessments and communicate the grading criteria clearly.
In line with prevailing Government guidelines for data governance, all IHLs have institutional safeguards to protect the confidentiality of student data. For instance, only institutionally approved AI platforms are used for AI-assisted assessment, and all personal identifiers are removed from student work before it is processed by AI grading systems.