Ensuring Concrete Improvements to Vehicular Safety Practices following January 2026's Voluntary Safety Time-out

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) had called for a voluntary Safety Time-out from 13 to 27 January 2026, focusing on vehicular safety because of four vehicle-related workplace fatalities in December. The objective of the Safety Time-out was to remind companies to take time off from their regular work routine to review and ensure that appropriate safety measures and procedures were in place, and for workers to refresh their knowledge of these procedures and to stay vigilant.

In line with the voluntary nature of the Safety Time-out, there were no inspections nor enforcement actions. MOM and the Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) Council, through its existing channels, have encouraged companies to participate in the Safety Time-out. They have also issued WSH advisories to guide companies on the key learning points from the recent incidents and the relevant safety practices to be reinforced with their workers.

In addition to initiating the recent Safety Time-out, MOM conducts regular inspections in the high-risk sectors where vehicular hazards are present. This ensures that companies comply with measures, such as having proper traffic management at the workplace and ensuring the drivers or operators have the requisite competencies. Around 500 inspections have been conducted in January. Three stop-work orders and five fines were issued to companies and individuals for vehicle-related breaches.

Mr Speaker, I thank the Minister of State for his reply. The reality on the ground is that tight scheduling and shift work patterns continue to entrench workers' fatigue. And we all know driving heavy vehicles is a very challenging task because of the vehicles' large size and unladen weight. Fatigue therefore compounds this difficulty and increases safety risks. Can the Minister of State share whether there are further plans to manage drivers' fatigue?

I would also like to ask how many employers have tapped on the resources and grants available for companies to adopt vehicular safety technologies? If these technologies are proven to improve safety, but take-up rate among these companies are low, then would the Ministry consider mandating the adoption of such technology to improve vehicular safety outcomes? Perhaps we can start off with the higher risk sectors.

I would like to thank the Member for the question and for the passion that he has for our workers. I would like to assure him that I personally went through every single case, particularly the ones in December. And as tragic as it was, I could not see any common trends or any root causes, per se. These could potentially have happened due to unfortunate lapses of judgement or not adhering to the existing safety protocols.

But that said, I would urge the Member to await the final investigations, which are currently ongoing, and then we can discuss on subsequent moves that need to be put in place, either be it because of fatigue or otherwise.

But he has raised important points about fatigue affecting drivers and I wanted to just say that what we have in place are WSH guidelines on fatigue management, where rest breaks are recommended and the need to manage shift work as well, as part of these WSH guidelines.

And in terms of technologies, we see some useful technologies, such as the driver status monitoring system, which detects driver fatigue.

On the question that the Member had on grants, I want to just highlight that we have the Productivity Solutions Grant (PSG) that small and medium enterprises can tap upon, where 50% of funding can be defrayed, for up to a cap of $30,000. And as at July 2025, about 1,000 companies have adopted vehicle safety technologies via the PSG, and a total of about $12.5 million has been dispensed.

I think we have to continue to push the adoption of technologies, especially the proven ones. As to whether or not for it to be mandated, I think we take a holistic and calibrated approach to all the solutions as well as the situation that we have. I think what we want to try to avoid is having a Maslow's Hammer type of a situation, where every problem is seen to be a nail that requires hammering. Instead, what we need to have is a repertoire of solutions, sometimes a loving nudge, a firm stare or a warning might in fact do the trick.

Having said that, the ultimate aim is really to have a lasting and sustainable safety culture in Singapore, and I look forward to working with the Member on it.