Debated in Parliament on 6 Nov 2025.
Mr Cai Yinzhou asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) what are the risk considerations to differentiate excessive disciplining from suspected cases of severe abuse where visible injuries are intentionally avoided before determining that a child cannot be safely maintained within the family and must be removed; (b) whether educators are empowered to request for a medical professional to conduct health assessments for such cases; and (c) what is the procedure.
Mr Cai Yinzhou asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) how does the Singapore Police Force locate parents or caregivers who may hold custody of a vulnerable child but are uncontactable or actively evading authorities in cases of suspected abuse; and (b) what inter-agency protocols have been enhanced to expedite such urgent search process.
Mr Foo Cexiang asked the Minister for Social and Family Development with reference to the Report on the Review Panel's Findings and Recommendations to Strengthen the Child Protection Ecosystem published on 23 October 2025, what were the differences in investigative actions taken by the police officers tasked to follow-up on the police reports dated 17 January 2020 and 20 July 2020 which led to starkly different outcomes.
This question has been answered as part of the Minister-in-charge of Social Services Integration’s oral reply to Parliamentary Questions at the sitting on 5 November 2025. [Please refer to "Lessons Learnt and New Processes following Review into Megan Khung Case", Official Report, 5 November 2025, Vol 96, Issue 10, Oral Answers to Questions section, and "Measures for Prompt Police Case Resolution and Mandating Assignment of Police Officers with Child Protection Training in Child-related Cases", Official Report, 5 November 2025, Vol 96, Issue 10, Oral Answers to Questions section.]
PAPERCUTS