Debated in Parliament on 14 Feb 2023.
Ms Carrie Tan asked the Minister for Social and Family Development (a) whether the Ministry will consider having a Registrar's Empowerment clause included in all Court orders relating to the sale and transfer of matrimonial assets to prevent situations of housing limbo faced by divorcees whose ex-spouses refuse or willfully delay the sale and transfer of their matrimonial flat; and (b) if not, what are the considerations and reasons for not including the clause.
Mr Speaker, Sir, in the vast majority of divorce proceedings, parties promptly comply with Court orders. It would be inappropriate for the Family Justice Court or Syariah Court to, without evidence, presume that one or both parties do not intend to comply. This is why the Court does not impose a Registrar's Empowerment Clause as a default option.
We are concerned about disempowering the parties to a matrimonial proceeding, which is also inconsistent with our intent to secure the best interest of the parties and their children. Instead, a therapeutic justice approach helps couples to move forward in a more positive way, rather than positioning parties as adversaries in Court.
In the rare case where one party refuses or wilfully delays the sale or transfer of the matrimonial assets, remedies already exist. The other party may return to Court and apply to vary the order. The Court may instruct the parties to address the underlying disagreement, such as for parties to accept the highest offer within a specific period. The Court may also then make a Registrar's Empowerment Clause.
Ms Carrie Tan, next question.