Global Leadership in Artificial Intelligence
- Gerald Giam argued that Singapore should adopt a more proactive industrial policy with ambitious "moonshots," such as healthcare AI, and a state-led AI corporation to build local talent, ensure data sovereignty, and secure global leadership.
- Senior Minister of State Janil Puthucheary countered that the government already supports similar outcomes through the National AI Strategy, emphasizing an open, collaborative ecosystem over protectionist measures and cautioning against the high costs and risks of picking specific winners.
- Giam proposed stricter local hiring quotas and knowledge transfer conditions for foreign talent, while the government defended a balanced approach that remains open to global talent to complement local upskilling efforts.
- The debate highlighted contrasting views on data strategy, with Giam advocating for local data sets and sovereignty, and the government stressing the necessity of cross-border data flows to maintain Singapore's competitiveness and global partnerships.
- Both sides agreed on the goal of using AI to benefit Singaporeans and achieve economic growth, but diverged on the methods, with the government favoring broad-based initiatives and the MP calling for targeted, high-risk strategic investments.